He who finds a thought that enables him to obtain a slightly deeper glimpse into the eternal secrets of nature has been given great grace. — Albert Einstein
Amazing! A record company takes advantage of illegal use of a song not sue the infringers but to use the infringement for selling the song — and succeeds wildly! (More here.) Again, infringement does no significant harm — anymore than free listens on radio or TV — and can actually increase sales. Someday, the recording industry may yet rediscover reality and give up its senseless, trouble-making beliefs….
Assholes and cretins: Apparently, the majority of don’t accept that Obama was born in the U.S.
Assholes and scumbags: East Hampton won’t expand its library’s children’s room for fear of poor children (from where?) using it.
Lying cocksucker: Rush Limbo: Threatens to move out of New York, still there. Please, Rush, leave our city, please!
See how dead racism is.
Obama does something right. Not terribly important like, I don’t know, stopping rampant, economy-destroying Wall Street speculation, but something…. Me, I personally would expect better from the Antichrist….
The public option: Dead again?
Actually, it’s worse over there.
The corporatist lawyers, how do they justify grossly disproportionate damages? Someone illegally downloads an album: $15.00 saved by the downloader yet an award of $80,000.00 is justifiable how? The corporatist lawyers have no problem with that but if an individual is, oh, say, crippled or killed by medical mistake or incompetence and seeks compensation through the court system, that bothers them. How do they justify that?
What is the purpose of this? Why do the Big Media think that they can attract an audience by doing everything except what they’re supposed to do?
Is inciting a deliberate killing legal? And isn’t fair to report about the inciter?
Loving married couple of the day: read about them — if you dare!
Perhaps someone can explain to me the difference between porn and this: